Subscribe in a reader
The first “E” in PESTEL is for economics. In a classic PESTEL analysis of the macro environment (in this case the Nuclear Industry) one is supposed to be looking at the effects of interest rates, economic growth, inflation and exchange rates.
Let’s try to take these things and review them through the nuclear lens. What makes [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Comments Off
Subscribe in a reader
Two weeks ago I discussed some of the basic political landscape affecting the nuclear industry. Last week we looked at the myriad agencies that affect the industry. This week is the final (I think) installment on Politics in the Nuclear Industry. We’re going on an international tour. There are a lot of countries out there [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Subscribe in a reader
Last week I discussed some of the basic political landscape affecting the nuclear industry. This week I’m looking at the myriad agencies that affect the industry. I had tried to start a blog post series last fall on the alphabet soup of agencies out there and started out with some descriptions of DOE, NRC, and [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Comments Off
Subscribe in a reader
I’ve read and heard a number of different assessments of Entergy’s fuel bet concerning Vermont Yankee. Unfortunately, people both for and against VY have assessed this bet incorrectly in terms of what they can and cannot do with that fuel once it has been loaded into the reactor. It happens that in one of my [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Subscribe in a reader
I’ve been going through some exercises to refine my consulting business model. More on that later, but a part of that was to do a high level analysis of the nuclear industry. It’s an interesting technique called a PESTEL analysis. The acronym stands for Political, Economic, Social, Technical, Environmental, and Legal. The idea is to [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Subscribe in a reader
For the last two weeks, I’ve been writing about lessons learned from Fukushima. This third and final part is to look at the broader impacts and see what lessons we can learn at the political level.
There are several interactions to look at between corporations, regulators, and governments, nationally as well as globally. Like the technical [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Subscribe in a reader
I started this series last week with a discussion of technical lessons learned. This week, I’ve spent at the American Nuclear Society annual meeting listening and talking about lots of different topics, but the one that reverberated most was, of course, Fukushima. ANS is a professional society dedicated to nuclear science and technology. There are [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Subscribe in a reader
The latest nuclear carnival is up for reading. Please take a look.
Read the rest of this entry »
Comments Off
Subscribe in a reader
I’ve spent some time over the last few weeks talking about “lessons learned from Fukushima” to several different audiences. There are many different ways to look at this event and many different “lessons” that are to be taught. However, I think it is useful to consider those lessons in about three different general classes.
1) Technical [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Subscribe in a reader
This entry was featured in the 57th carnival of nuclear bloggers on the ANS Nuclear Cafe:
There is much being made of NRC Chairman Jaczko’s job performance, his political maneuverings and congressional hearings into his performance as chairman of the NRC. What is less clear is whether any of this really matters.
After listening to and reading [...]
Read the rest of this entry »